Skip Navigation

Science & Innovation Policy: Research ethics

News

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Thai PhD withdrawal leads to calls to retract article

Prime Sarmiento

29 June 2012 | EN

Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, Thailand

Chulalongkorn University is at the centre of the storm surrounding a Thai official plagiarism case

Flickr/zoonabar

[MANILA] A decision by a Thai university to rescind, on the grounds of plagiarism, a PhD previously granted to a senior government official has stirred up calls for a local academic journal to retract the official's allegedly plagiarised article, published in 2008.

Last week, Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, decided to revoke the doctorate it had granted in 2008 to Supachai Lorlowhakarn, director of the National Innovation Agency (NIA), an organisation operating under the umbrella of the Thai government's Ministry of Science and Health.

The decision followed an official university investigation, which, in 2010, revealed that Supachai had copied directly from other sources, including a technical assistance report published by the UN.

In addition to the PhD-related plagiarism charges levelled at Supachai, he also allegedly plagiarised an article on organic agriculture, based on his thesis and published in the Thai Journal of Agricultural Science (TJAS) in 2008.

Wageningen Academic Publishers, which holds the copyright to the original article that was allegedly
plagiarised by Supachai, has renewed its demand to TJAS to retract Supachai's article.

"I hope and believe that TJAS will reconsider the case and retract the article," Lieke Boersma, an editor at
Wageningen Academic Publishers, told SciDev.Net.

Boersma said that Chulalongkorn's decision regarding Supachai should prompt TJAS editor Irb Kheoruenromne to withdraw the article. This, she said, would be "the right decision".

"I will wait for TJAS to take the necessary steps, but if they still fail to take action, I will contact them again," she said.

British agricultural consultant Wyn Ellis, the principal author of one of the works claimed to have been
plagiarised by Supachai, added that "pressure needs to be put on TJAS, which still hasn't revoked the paper".

In an interview, TJAS editor, Irb Kheoruenromne, said that "chances are high" that the journal will withdraw Supachai's article.

However, Supachai is currently threatening to file a case against Chulalongkorn University's decision, and so Irb is waiting for the outcome of this possible action before making a decision on retraction.

Supachai did not respond to requests for comment from SciDev.Net. But an email Supachai sent to Irb last May, revealed that Supachai insisted that he had not plagiarised anything but had, as NIA director, "duly requested, and received an approval, to use some parts of the study" in his thesis.

Link to the allegedly plagiarised article in TJAS [259kB]

Comments (2)

Wyn Ellis ( Chulalongkorn University | Thailand )

1 July 2012

Thank you for publicizing this case. Individual plagiarism is contemptible enough, but when officials and publishers turn a blind eye and refuse to act, a culture of impunity rules, and only the shame of media exposure will make a difference.

To clarify the TJAS allegation, I am posting on my Facebook wall a link to the unpublished proof copy of the original review paper, written mainly by myself in 2007. The original publisher cancelled publication at the last minute following a legal threat against it... I have cross-referenced to identical text appearing in the TJAS paper.

I'm also posting a link to the TJAS paper, annotated to show the disputed text, along with fatal methological flaws which any honest reviewer would have considered as grounds for rejection.

Will the TJAS Editor-in-Chief please stand up and explain why such mediocrity is allowed to masquerade as science in a Scopus-indexed international journal?

Wyn Ellis ( Chulalongkorn University | Thailand )

10 July 2012

Dr Plodprasop Suraswadi, Thailand's Minister of Science and Technology, quoted in a Thai language interview (ThaiPublica.org) insists that the revocation of the PhD has no implications for the NIA Director's job. According to the Minister, he based his job application on his MSc not his PhD, so had committed no offence at the Ministry. When asked about the impact on the image of MOST, he replied that this was a matter for Supachai to consider. MOST could not set up an investigating panel as he had not filed any false documents to the Ministry.

However, the article notes at the end that a representative of Chula Faculty of Science alumni had also reported inconsistencies concerning the NIA Director's Bachelor degree at Chula.

Digging their heels in to the bitter end...

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to News
To the top